BacklinkScan logoBacklinkScan
Log inGet started

Backlink Audits: What to Fix First

BacklinkScan Teamon Dec 23, 2025
28 min read

Backlink audits help you quickly spot toxic backlinks, spammy domains, and over-optimized anchor text that can quietly drag down your rankings. Instead of trying to fix everything at once, you need a clear order of operations: tackle the riskiest and most unnatural links first, then refine your overall link profile and strategy.

In this guide, you’ll learn how to prioritize issues in your backlink profile, from obvious spam (casino, adult, hacked sites, deindexed domains) to anchor text abuse and unnatural link patterns. We’ll walk through which links to remove or disavow, what can safely wait, and how to turn a one‑off backlink audit into an ongoing safeguard for your SEO.

Backlink audits matter because Google now uses advanced spam systems like SpamBrain to detect and neutralize manipulative links at scale. When that happens, the value from spammy backlinks can vanish overnight, or in worse cases trigger manual actions and serious ranking drops.

A good backlink audit is not about chasing every ugly link. It is about finding the few patterns that can actually hurt you, fixing the highest‑risk issues first, and then deciding what is safe to ignore.

You do not need a full backlink audit every week. You probably do need one when:

  • You see a sharp, unexplained drop in organic traffic or rankings, especially around known spam or link updates.
  • You receive a manual action or unnatural links warning in Google Search Console.
  • You have used aggressive link building in the past: paid links, private blog networks, bulk guest posts, or automated link packages.
  • You notice a sudden spike in new backlinks from low‑quality or irrelevant sites, which can be a sign of negative SEO.

Outside of emergencies, many sites benefit from a light audit once or twice a year, just to keep link risk under control.

A backlink profile can quietly drag you down even without a visible penalty. Warning signs include:

  • Rankings that slowly erode while competitors with similar content hold steady.
  • A large share of links from obvious link farms, spun‑content blogs, or thin directories.
  • Many backlinks using the exact same keyword‑rich anchor text, especially “money” keywords.
  • Links from hacked sites, foreign forums, or adult/gambling pages that have nothing to do with your topic.

Even if Google is already ignoring some of these links, a messy profile increases the risk that future spam updates will hit you harder.

How to decide what “fix first” means for your site

“Fix first” should always mean “reduce real risk fastest,” not “clean everything perfectly.” A simple way to set priorities in a backlink audit is:

  1. Active penalties and clear violations
  • Manual actions, unnatural link warnings, or obvious link schemes (paid links without proper attributes, PBNs, large link exchanges) go to the top of the list. These can suppress visibility until you clean them up.
  1. Patterns that look manufactured at scale
  • Sitewide footer links, repeated guest posts on low‑value sites, or hundreds of links with the same exact‑match anchor are next. They are prime targets for spam systems and future updates.
  1. Clearly irrelevant or low‑trust sources
  • Off‑topic, spammy, or hacked domains that send many links but no real traffic are usually worth addressing after the worst violations.
  1. Cosmetic noise
  • Random low‑value links that are not part of a pattern and do not violate guidelines can often be left alone. Google is good at ignoring them, and your time is better spent earning stronger, relevant links.

If you are unsure where to start, begin with anything that could reasonably trigger a manual review, then move down the list. The goal of a backlink audit is not perfection; it is to make your link profile look natural, resilient, and boring from Google’s point of view.

Before you decide what to remove, disavow, or keep, you need a single, clean view of your backlink profile. That means pulling backlinks from several sources, exporting them, and consolidating everything into one master sheet. You will never get a “perfect” list, but you can get close enough to make smart decisions.

No single tool sees every backlink, so aim for coverage rather than perfection. A practical setup is:

  • Google Search Console (GSC) for what Google itself reports. Use the Links report and the “Export external links” options to grab top linked pages, top linking sites, and latest links.
  • At least one major backlink crawler (Ahrefs, Semrush, or Moz). These tools maintain their own link indexes and will usually find links that GSC does not show, and vice versa.

If you work on larger or more competitive sites, combining GSC with two commercial tools often gives a noticeably fuller backlink list, but even one good crawler plus GSC is enough for most audits.

In Google Search Console:

  1. Open the property and go to Links.
  2. Under External links, click into:
  • Top linked pages
  • Top linking sites
  • Top linking text
  1. Use Export external links in the top right and download to CSV, Excel, or Google Sheets. For deeper work, export both “Latest links” and “More sample links” so you get freshness and breadth.

In Ahrefs, Semrush, and Moz (process is similar across tools):

  • Go to the main backlinks or referring domains report for your domain.
  • Apply basic filters if needed (for example, live links only, exclude nofollow if you are focusing on equity).
  • Use the Export button to download all rows allowed by your plan, ideally including:
  • Source URL
  • Source domain
  • Target URL on your site
  • Anchor text
  • Link attributes (nofollow, sponsored, UGC)
  • First seen / last seen dates
  • Any authority or toxicity metrics the tool provides.

Name each file clearly (for example, domain-gsc-latest-links-2025-12-23.csv, domain-ahrefs-backlinks.csv) so you can track where each row came from.

Consolidating and deduplicating domains and URLs in a single sheet

Once you have exports from GSC and your backlink tools, bring them into one spreadsheet (Excel or Google Sheets works fine):

  1. Standardize columns Create a master header row that covers everything you care about, such as:
  • Source domain
  • Source URL
  • Target URL
  • Anchor text
  • Link type (follow / nofollow / sponsored / UGC)
  • Tool source (GSC, Ahrefs, Semrush, Moz)
  • Metrics (DR/DA, spam score, estimated traffic, first seen, last seen)

When you paste each export into a “raw” tab, map its columns into this standard structure on a “master” tab using formulas or copy‑paste.

  1. Normalize domains and URLs
  • Convert all domains to lowercase.
  • Strip common prefixes like http://, https://, and www. into a separate “clean domain” column.
  • Optionally trim URL parameters if they are not important for your audit (for example, remove tracking parameters like utm_source).
  1. Deduplicate rows
  • First, remove exact duplicate backlinks using your spreadsheet’s “Remove duplicates” feature on at least:
  • Clean domain
  • Source URL
  • Target URL
  • Then create a separate “Referring domains” tab where you keep one row per domain, aggregating metrics like total links, number of target pages, and which tools saw the domain.
  1. Keep raw data intact Always leave the original exports untouched on separate tabs. Do your cleaning and deduplication on copies or a master tab so you can go back if you make a mistake.

By the end of this step, you should have one clean sheet that shows each unique backlink and each unique referring domain, with enough context to start spotting patterns and prioritizing what to fix.

First check: do you have a manual action or obvious penalties?

Before you worry about toxic links or disavow files, you should confirm whether Google has already flagged your site. A manual action or clear penalty changes your priorities completely, because it means a human reviewer has decided your backlink profile or other behavior violates guidelines.

How to quickly check for manual actions in Google Search Console

In Google Search Console, use the property that matches the version of your site you actually care about (correct protocol and domain).

Then:

  1. Open Search Console and select your site.
  2. In the left menu, look for “Security & Manual Actions”.
  3. Click “Manual actions”.

You will see one of two things:

  • “No issues detected”: there is no manual action on the property you are viewing.
  • A listed manual action, often with:
  • A short description (for example, “Unnatural links to your site” or “Pure spam”).
  • Scope (site‑wide or partial).
  • The date it was applied.
  • A link to request reconsideration after you fix the issues.

If you manage multiple versions of the site (http/https, with and without www, subdomains), check each one. Manual actions can be scoped to a specific property.

What to do differently if you already have a manual action

If you see a manual action related to links, your backlink audit is no longer optional cleanup. It is a recovery project, and your process should change:

  • Focus on the reasons named in the manual action. If it mentions “unnatural links to your site,” prioritize identifying manipulative, paid, or obviously spammy backlinks.
  • Document everything. Keep a clear record of which links you removed, which you tried to remove, and which you disavowed. You will need this for a reconsideration request.
  • Actively try to remove bad links. Do not jump straight to disavow. Reach out to webmasters, remove links you control, and fix any link schemes you are involved in.
  • Use the disavow tool as a backstop. For links you cannot remove, group them by domain and add them to a carefully prepared disavow file.
  • Plan for multiple reconsideration attempts. Recovery from a manual action can take time. Be honest in your request, explain what you changed, and show that you understand the guidelines.

With a manual action, speed and thoroughness matter more than perfection. You want to show clear, good‑faith effort to clean up the problem patterns Google called out.

Prioritizing urgent risks vs routine cleanup

Think of backlink issues in two buckets: urgent risks and routine cleanup.

Urgent risks are problems that can trigger or worsen penalties:

  • An active manual action in Search Console.
  • A sudden, sharp drop in organic traffic or impressions that lines up with a known spam‑related update and a history of aggressive link building.
  • Large volumes of obvious link schemes you control, such as paid sitewide links, private blog networks, or link exchanges.

These should be handled first. Pause new link building, focus on removing or neutralizing the worst offenders, and prepare for a reconsideration request if needed.

Routine cleanup is everything else:

  • Old low‑quality directory links.
  • Random scraper sites.
  • A small number of questionable links that are not part of a pattern.

These are worth addressing, but only after you have ruled out or dealt with manual actions and clear penalties. By separating urgent risks from routine housekeeping, you avoid overreacting to harmless noise and put your effort where it can actually protect or restore your rankings.

In most backlink audits, the first priority is toxic or obviously spammy links. These are links from sites that exist only to manipulate rankings, not to help users. Common patterns include auto‑generated blogs, scraper sites, spun‑content networks, hacked pages, and pages stuffed with casino, pills, or adult content with no real purpose.

Start by sorting your backlink list by domain quality and traffic. Domains with no real organic traffic, nonsensical content, or huge outbound link lists to unrelated sites are prime candidates. If a page looks like it was built only to sell or drop links, treat those backlinks as high‑risk and put them at the top of your cleanup list.

Next, look at sitewide links and anything that smells like a link network or paid placement. A sitewide link is a backlink that appears in the header, footer, or sidebar on hundreds or thousands of pages. One or two natural sitewide links (for example, a genuine partner or association) are usually fine, but large volumes from weak or unrelated domains can look manipulative.

Link networks and paid links often share footprints: similar designs, the same owner details, identical content templates, or “write for us / sponsored post” pages where every article is stuffed with followed commercial anchors. If you see clusters of domains that all link to you with money keywords, treat them as a group and prioritize them for removal or disavow.

Over‑optimized or spammy anchor text patterns

Even if the linking sites are not terrible, your anchor text profile can still cause problems. Over‑optimized anchors are those that use exact‑match or very commercial keywords too often, especially from low‑quality or semi‑relevant sites. For example, if half of your backlinks use the same “best cheap car insurance” anchor, that is a red flag.

During a backlink audit, flag anchors that are:

  • Exact‑match money keywords used repeatedly
  • Long, spammy phrases that read like ad copy
  • Repeated across many domains in identical form

These links are not always toxic by themselves, but in bulk they can signal manipulation. They should be high on your “fix first” list, either by removal, disavow, or by later dilution with more natural anchors.

Finally, pay close attention to backlinks from sites that are wildly off‑topic, especially adult, gambling, or other “high‑risk” niches. A few random links from odd places are normal on the web, but patterns matter. If a business site in finance, health, or local services has many backlinks from adult, casino, or shady download sites, that can drag down trust.

In your audit, group these irrelevant backlinks by niche and volume. Prioritize links where:

  • The content topic has nothing to do with your site
  • Your brand or URL is dropped into thin, low‑effort pages
  • The domain is part of a known risky vertical (adult, gambling, counterfeit, malware)

Those are usually worth addressing early, because they combine both topical irrelevance and higher spam risk, which makes them more likely to hurt than help your backlink profile.

Toxic backlinks are usually obvious once you know what to look for. The trick is to spot real risks quickly without panicking about every low‑authority or unfamiliar site. Think in terms of patterns: volume, relevance, and intent. A few odd links are normal; consistent manipulative signals are not.

Using spam score, DR/DA, and traffic metrics wisely

Spam scores, Domain Rating/Authority, and traffic estimates are helpful filters, not verdicts.

Use them to triage:

  • Sort by lowest DR/DA and zero‑traffic pages first. Many toxic links live on domains with very weak authority and no organic traffic. A cluster of backlinks from such sites is a strong “investigate me” signal.
  • Check spam or toxicity scores as a hint, not a rule. High scores often correlate with link farms, auto‑generated content, or hacked pages, but tools can mislabel new or niche sites. Treat scores as a way to prioritize manual review, not as automatic disavow lists.
  • Look at referring domain diversity and velocity. A sudden spike of links from low‑quality domains, or many links from the same small network, is more worrying than a single random link.

If a low‑DR site is clearly real, relevant to your topic, and has some organic visibility, it is usually fine even if its metrics are modest.

Red flags when you manually review suspicious linking pages

Once you have a shortlist, open a sample of those pages. Toxic backlinks often share clear red flags:

  • Thin, spun, or nonsensical content where your link appears with no real editorial context.
  • Pages stuffed with outbound links to unrelated sites (finance, casinos, pills, adult, crypto, etc.) that look like a directory or “resources” page built only to sell links.
  • Obvious link schemes such as sitewide footer/sidebar links, boilerplate author bios reused across many domains, or templated guest posts whose main purpose is keyword‑rich links.
  • Aggressive ads and pop‑ups, auto‑redirects, or malware warnings, which signal a very low‑trust environment.
  • Irrelevant language or geography, like dozens of foreign‑language domains linking to a local US plumber with exact‑match anchors.

If you see several of these on the same domain, you are likely dealing with a toxic or at least very low‑value backlink source.

Not every weak or odd backlink is dangerous. Search engines now ignore a lot of spam automatically, so overreacting can do more harm than good if you disavow useful links by mistake.

A backlink is more likely truly harmful when:

  • It is part of a clear pattern of paid, exchanged, or networked links designed to manipulate rankings.
  • The anchor text is heavily keyword‑stuffed or exact‑match money terms, repeated across many domains.
  • The linking site is a known link farm, PBN, or hacked domain, with no real audience or purpose beyond selling links.

By contrast, a link is usually just harmless and low‑value if:

  • The site is small but real, with some unique content and a logical reason to mention you.
  • The anchor text is branded, URL‑based, or generic (“click here”), not obviously manipulative.
  • There is no pattern of many similar links from the same network.

In practice, focus your “toxic backlink” energy on clear patterns of manipulation. Let search engines quietly ignore the random noise, and save your disavow or removal efforts for links that are both low‑quality and clearly unnatural.

When to request removal instead of jumping to disavow

Request removal when a backlink is clearly manipulative, recent, and you can reasonably reach the site owner. Typical cases include paid links that violate search guidelines, links you arranged yourself in the past, or links from obvious spam sites that are still active. In these situations, asking for removal shows a good‑faith effort to clean up your backlink profile.

Start with a short, polite email that identifies the exact URL and anchor text and asks for the link to be removed or nofollowed. Keep a record of every attempt and response. If the site is still maintained, has a visible contact method, and the link is part of a pattern (for example, a batch of guest posts or directory submissions), removal is usually the first and best step.

You do not need to chase every low‑value link. Focus removal requests on links that are clearly unnatural, scalable, or tied to your own past SEO activity.

When a disavow file makes sense (and when it doesn’t)

A disavow file is a safety net, not a routine maintenance tool. It makes sense when:

  • You have a history of aggressive link building and now see many spammy or paid links you cannot get removed.
  • You suspect an algorithmic issue related to links, or you have a manual action that cites “unnatural links” and removal attempts have hit a wall.
  • There is large‑scale negative SEO or automated spam pointing at your site that you cannot practically clean up one by one.

In those cases, disavowing at the domain level for clearly toxic sources is usually more efficient than listing individual URLs.

A disavow file does not make sense for normal, mixed‑quality backlink profiles, for a few random junk links, or as a way to “prune” links you simply do not like. Used too broadly, it can throw away real link equity and slow your organic growth. If a link is merely weak, off‑topic, or from a small site but not clearly manipulative, it usually does not belong in the disavow file.

Not every imperfect backlink is a problem. You will almost always see some links from small blogs, scraped copies of your content, odd‑looking forums, or auto‑generated pages that mention your brand. These are often just noise and are treated that way by modern search algorithms.

You can usually keep links that:

  • Come from real sites with some organic traffic, even if the design is poor.
  • Use branded or URL anchors rather than exact‑match money keywords.
  • Are one‑off mentions, not part of a clear pattern of manipulative link building.

If you are unsure, ask yourself: “Would this link exist if SEO did not exist?” If the answer is “probably yes” because it is a genuine mention, citation, or reference, it is safer to leave it alone. Save your energy for links that are clearly toxic or tied to past tactics you would not repeat today.

Fixing anchor text problems in your backlink profile

How to find exact‑match and money keyword anchor text issues

Start by pulling a full list of backlinks with their anchor text from your main link tools and Google Search Console. Filter for anchors that exactly match your primary keywords, product names, or “money” phrases like “buy [keyword]”, “cheap [keyword]”, or “[keyword] discount”.

Look at percentages, not just raw counts. If a single commercial keyword or very close variations make up a large share of your anchors to an important page, that is a red flag. For branded pages, you should see a healthy mix of brand name, naked URLs, generic anchors (“click here”, “website”), and partial‑match phrases.

Also check for patterns across domains. If many different sites use the same exact‑match anchor text, it often signals link building campaigns, guest posts with templated bios, or link insertions that might look manipulative. Group anchors by landing page so you can see which URLs have the most aggressive anchor text profile.

What to fix first if anchors are over‑optimized

When anchors are clearly over‑optimized, focus first on high‑risk combinations:

  • Exact‑match money keywords pointing to key commercial pages
  • Repeated anchors from low‑quality or obviously paid placements
  • Anchors that look spun or stuffed with multiple keywords

Start with links that combine several risk factors at once: low‑quality site, unnatural placement, and exact‑match anchor. Those are the most likely to be discounted or to contribute to a manual action.

For stronger sites that you want to keep, you usually do not need to remove the link. Instead, try to soften the anchor. If you can edit guest posts, sponsored content, or partner pages, change anchors from pure money terms to branded or partial‑match phrases, or even to a naked URL.

Do not chase perfection. You are aiming to reduce obvious manipulation, not to turn every anchor into a brand mention. A natural profile always has some exact‑match anchors; the problem is when they dominate.

Safer ways to dilute or rebalance anchor text over time

The safest way to fix anchor text problems is to add better links, not just delete bad ones. Plan new link building that favors:

  • Brand anchors (company or site name)
  • Naked URLs and “visit site” style anchors
  • Descriptive but non‑spammy phrases that include only part of your keyword

As you earn more of these, the overall percentage of exact‑match anchors drops, even if some older links stay as they are.

You can also reach out to cooperative site owners and suggest small edits: change “best cheap blue widgets” to your brand name, or to a softer phrase like “blue widgets from [Brand]”. Prioritize edits on pages that get real traffic or sit on strong domains.

Internally, keep your own anchor text conservative. Use varied, natural anchors in your internal links so you are not reinforcing the same money keyword pattern. Over a few months, this combination of new, safer backlinks, selective edits, and balanced internal linking will gradually rebalance your anchor text profile without sudden, risky changes.

Technical backlink issues are often the easiest wins in a backlink audit. You are not changing who links to you, only how that link equity flows into your site. The goal is simple: make sure every valuable backlink points to a live, relevant URL that can actually rank and convert.

Start by finding backlinks that point to 404 pages or other hard errors. These are links you already “earned” but are currently wasting.

Focus first on:

  • Backlinks from strong, relevant domains that hit 404s
  • Broken links to pages that used to rank or get traffic
  • Broken links with good anchor text that matches your current topics

For each important broken backlink, decide whether to:

  1. Recreate the content at the old URL if it was unique and still useful.
  2. 301 redirect the dead URL to the closest live, relevant page.
  3. If there is no close match, redirect to a higher‑level category or hub page, not the homepage by default.

Work from highest‑value links down. Fixing a handful of strong broken backlinks can have more impact than cleaning hundreds of low‑value ones.

During site migrations, URL changes, or CMS updates, backlinks often end up pointing at old or duplicate URLs. That can dilute link equity or send users through long redirect chains.

When you audit these:

  • Replace long redirect chains with a single, clean 301 from the old URL to the best current page.
  • Avoid 302s or meta refreshes for permanent moves; use 301s so search engines pass full value.
  • If multiple old URLs now serve the same content, pick a single canonical URL and redirect all variants there.

If you changed URL structure (for example, removed dates from blog URLs), check that your redirect rules are consistent and not creating loops. The aim is a simple, direct path from any linked old URL to one final, authoritative destination.

Canonical and hreflang tags tell search engines how to treat similar or translated pages. If they are misconfigured, they can send mixed signals about where link equity should go.

Watch for:

  • Pages with strong backlinks that canonicalize to a different, weaker page for no good reason.
  • Self‑referencing canonicals missing on key pages, leaving search engines to guess the “main” version.
  • Hreflang tags that point to URLs that do not exist, redirect, or use a different canonical target.

In most cases, the page that earns the backlinks should either:

  • Have a self‑referencing canonical, or
  • Canonical to a very close, updated replacement that truly represents the same intent.

For international sites, make sure each language or country version:

  • Uses hreflang to reference its correct regional URL
  • References all siblings in the hreflang cluster
  • Shares a consistent canonical strategy so link equity is not split across near‑duplicates

Cleaning up these structural details helps search engines consolidate signals, pass more authority into the right URLs, and reduce wasted link equity across your site.

Simple spreadsheet template to log removals and disavows

Before you start removing or disavowing backlinks, set up a simple tracking sheet. It does not need to be fancy, but it must be consistent. A single spreadsheet that covers all backlink cleanup work will save you from guessing what you did three months from now.

At minimum, include these columns:

  • Source URL – the exact page that links to you.
  • Linking domain – root domain of the site.
  • Target URL – the page on your site that received the link.
  • Anchor text – how the link is labeled.
  • Issue type – for example: “toxic,” “spammy anchor,” “irrelevant,” “sitewide,” “paid/suspected,” “broken link.”
  • Action chosen – “keep,” “outreach for removal,” “disavow domain,” “disavow URL,” “fix via redirect,” and so on.
  • Status – “pending,” “in outreach,” “removed,” “disavowed,” “no response,” “kept.”
  • Date added and last updated – so you can see how long items sit in each stage.
  • Notes – quick context like “PBN footprint,” “auto‑generated directory,” or “good site but wrong anchor.”

For disavows, add a simple flag such as Included in disavow file? (Y/N) and the disavow batch date. Each time you upload a new disavow file, log the date and keep a copy of the exact text you submitted in a separate tab. That way, if you ever need to roll back or explain your actions, you have a clear record.

When you ask site owners to remove links, treat it like a small outreach campaign. In your spreadsheet, either add extra columns or use a second tab dedicated to outreach details.

Helpful columns include:

  • Contact email or form URL
  • First outreach date
  • Follow‑up dates (1st, 2nd, 3rd follow‑up if you send them)
  • Response received? (Y/N)
  • Outcome – “removed,” “refused,” “payment requested,” “no reply,” “email bounced.”

Use short, factual notes such as “Removed within 24 hours,” or “Requested $50 to remove link; declined and disavowed domain.” This level of detail helps you decide when to stop chasing a removal and move on to disavow instead.

If you ever need to file a reconsideration request after a manual action, this outreach log becomes evidence that you made a real effort to clean up your backlink profile, not just upload a disavow file and hope for the best.

Monitoring ranking and traffic changes after cleanup

Backlink cleanup is only useful if it improves your site’s health. To see that clearly, track performance metrics alongside your backlink work.

Create another tab in the same spreadsheet and log, at least monthly:

  • Total organic sessions and organic clicks for your site.
  • Average position and impressions for key pages that were heavily affected by bad links.
  • Number of links removed and number of domains disavowed in that period.
  • Notable events – for example, “Uploaded disavow file,” “Completed outreach to 50 domains,” or “Major Google update.”

Try to line up changes in rankings and traffic with your cleanup milestones. For example, if you see a gradual recovery starting a few weeks after a large batch of toxic domains was disavowed, note that relationship. At the same time, avoid over‑attributing every fluctuation to your backlink audit; algorithm updates, content changes, and technical fixes also move the needle.

By keeping backlink actions and performance data in one place, you can see which types of fixes actually help, refine your priorities for the next audit, and avoid repeating work that did not move results.

What to do after the first big cleanup pass

After your first major backlink cleanup, treat audits as routine maintenance, not an emergency project. The right schedule depends on how active and risky your environment is:

  • Small or low‑competition sites with little link building: a full backlink audit every 6–12 months is usually enough, with light checks in between.
  • Typical growing business sites: aim for a quarterly audit, plus quick monthly reviews of new and lost links.
  • Large, aggressive, or high‑risk niches (finance, legal, health, gambling, big ecommerce, or sites with a penalty history): plan monthly audits and continuous monitoring of new backlinks.

On top of that, schedule extra audits when:

  • You see a sudden ranking or traffic drop that is not explained by seasonality.
  • There is a major Google core or spam update.
  • You finish a big link building campaign or a site migration.

Put these dates in your project management tool or calendar so backlink audits become a predictable habit instead of a reaction to crises.

Between full audits, you want lightweight, ongoing monitoring so problems never pile up again. A simple system can look like this:

  • Set up alerts in your backlink tools and analytics for new referring domains, sudden spikes in links, or unusual anchor text.
  • Review “new” and “lost” backlinks weekly or bi‑weekly. Scan for obvious spam patterns like foreign‑language casino pages, auto‑generated blogs, or hacked sites.
  • Log suspicious domains in a dedicated tab of your backlink spreadsheet, with columns for date found, risk level, and action taken.
  • Watch your disavow file like a configuration file: keep a backup, update it only when you are confident a domain is truly toxic, and re‑review it during each major audit.

This light monitoring lets you catch negative SEO attempts, low‑quality link bursts from scrapers, or risky placements from over‑eager partners before they turn into a ranking problem.

Once the worst backlinks are handled and your profile is stable, the biggest gains come from building better links, not endlessly pruning bad ones. At this stage, your priorities should shift:

  1. Use your audit insights to guide link strategy Look at which pages and topics already attract good links and double down on them with deeper content, updated resources, or related assets.

  2. Invest in link earning, not link schemes Focus on tactics that naturally generate high‑quality backlinks over time, such as:

  • Digital PR and newsworthy content
  • Helpful tools, data studies, or guides that others want to reference
  • Thoughtful guest contributions on relevant, reputable sites

These approaches build authority and are far safer than buying links or using private networks.

  1. Balance defense with offense Keep your monitoring and periodic audits running quietly in the background, but spend most of your SEO energy on creating link‑worthy content and relationships. Think of cleanup as insurance and link earning as growth.

Over time, a consistent cycle of light monitoring, scheduled backlink audits, and steady acquisition of strong, relevant links will do far more for your rankings than obsessing over every questionable backlink that appears.